(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-23 12:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] uk-sef.livejournal.com
We need enough of the right sort of people to start running their own ISP (and associated services) - one which sticks by the "innocent until proven guilty" principle and requires decent evidence from complainers before taking seriously any accusations of plagiarism and defamation. Then all the rest of the decent people could join that one instead. Too many of the existing internet operations are run by scum (the incompetent as well as the corrupt) who are inclined to believe and act on unsubstantiated complaints by dishonest people.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-24 12:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] armb.livejournal.com
That assumes the law will allow decent ISPs to do that.

From http://www.boingboing.net/2009/11/20/britains-new-interne.html:
"A duty on ISPs to spy on all their customers in case they find something that would help the record or film industry sue them (ISPs who refuse to cooperate can be fined £250,000)."

And the Bill enables secondary legislation to be used to add arbitrary extra powers practically any time the Secretary of State feels like it.

The government did (to some extent) listen to criticism of the way the
Coroners and Justice Bill allowed ministers to override data protection rules if they felt like it, so there's some hope of the disproportionate measures in this being similarly reduced.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/libertycentral/2009/jan/19/coroners-justice-bill
http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/briefings/snha-05001.pdf
http://www.statewatch.org/news/2009/feb/uk-ml-convention-clause-152-briefing.pdf

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-24 10:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] uk-sef.livejournal.com
Just saving another link here.

December 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags